By Anat Kleinmann, Senior Product Manager at AlgoSec
With customer demands changing at breakneck
speed, organizations need to be agile to win in their digital markets. This
requires fast and frequent application deployments, forcing DevOps teams to
streamline their software development processes. However, without the right
security tools placed in the early phase of the CI/CD pipeline, these processes
can be counterproductive leading to costly human errors and prolonged
application deployment backups. This is why organizations need to find the
right preventive security approach and explore achieving this through
Infrastructure-as-Code.
Understanding Infrastructure as Code -
what does it actually mean?
Infrastructure-as-Code (Iac) is a software
development method that describes the complete environment in which the
software runs. It contains information about the hardware, networks, and
software that are needed to run the application. IAC is also referred to as
declarative provisioning or automated provisioning. In other words, IAC enables
security teams to create an automated and repeatable process to build out an
entire environment. This is helpful for eliminating human errors that can be
associated with manual configuration. The purpose of IaC is to enable
developers or operations teams to automatically manage, monitor and provision
resources, rather than manually configure discrete hardware devices and
operating systems.
What does IaC mean in the context of
running applications in a cloud environment
When using IaC, network configuration files
can contain your applications connectivity infrastructure connectivity specifications
changes, which mkes it easier to edit, review and distribute. It also ensures
that you provision the same environment every time and minimizes the downtime
that can occur due to security breaches. Using Infrastructure as code (IaC)
helps you to avoid undocumented, ad-hoc configuration changes and allows you to
enforce security policies in advance before making the changes in your
network.
Top 5 challenges when not embracing a
preventive security approach
- Counterintuitive communication channel - When reviewing the
code manually, DevOps needs to provide access to a security manager to
review it and rely on the security manager for feedback. This can create a
lot of unnecessary back and forth communication between the teams which
can be a highly counterintuitive process.
- Mismanagement of DevOps resources - Developers need to work on
multiple platforms due to the nature of their work. This may include
developing the code in one platform, checking the code in another, testing
the code in a third platform and reviewing requests in a fourth platform.
When this happens, developers often will not be alerted of any network
risk or non-compliance issue as defined by the organization.
- Mismanagement of SecOps resources - At the same time, network
security managers are also bombarded with security review requests and
tasks. Yet, they are expected to be agile, which is impossible in case of
manual risk detection.
- Inefficient workflow - Sometimes risk analysis process is
skipped and only reviewed at the end of the CI/CD pipeline, which prolongs
the delivery of the application.
- Time consuming review process - The risk analysis review itself
can sometimes take more than 30 minutes long which can create unnecessary
and costly bottlenecking, leading to missed rollout deadlines of critical
applications
Why it's important to place security
early in the development cycle
Infrastructure-as-code (IaC) is a crucial
part of DevSecOps practices. The current trend is based on the principle of
shift-left, which places security early in the development cycle. This allows
organizations to take a proactive, preventive approach rather than a reactive
one. This approach solves the problem of developers leaving security
checks and testing for the later stages of a project often as it nears
completion and deployment.
It is critical to take a proactive approach
since late-stage security checks lead to two critical problems. Security flaws
can go undetected and make it into the released software, and security issues
detected at the end of the software development lifecycle demand considerably
more time, resources and money to remediate than those identified early
on.
The Power of IaC Connectivity Risk
Analysis and Key Benefits
IaC connectivity risk analysis provides
automatic and proactive connectivity risk analysis, enabling a frictionless
workflow for DevOps with continuous customized risk analysis and remediation
managed and controlled by the security managers.
IaC Connectivity Risk Analysis enables
organizations to use a single source of truth for managing the lifecycle of
their applications. Furthermore, security engineers can use IaC to automate the
design, deployment, and management of virtual assets across a hybrid cloud
environment. With automated security tests, engineers can also continuously
test their infrastructure for security issues early in the development phase.
Key benefits
- Deliver business applications into production faster and more
securely
- Enable a frictionless workflow with continuous risk analysis
and remediation
- Reduce connectivity risks earlier in the CI/CD process
- Customizable risk policy to surface only the most critical
risks
The Takeaway
Don't get bogged down by security and
compliance. When taking a preventive approach using a connectivity risk analysis
via IaC, you can increase the speed of deployment, reduce misconfiguration and
compliance errors, improve DevOps - SecOps relationship and lower costs.
##
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Anat Kleinmann is a Senior Product Manager at AlgoSec. In her role, Anat
leads the Cloud Platform and the new CI/CD tools for DevSecOps. Anat has more
than 20 years of Network Security and Cloud experience in engineering, product
management and product marketing.